Lots of people are discussing or retitting about Twitter’s Growth which some start to regard as a spam because there are too many tweets about it. Yet is this growth only a numerical phenomenon? Let’s examine it more profoundly.
Most of the people are excited that Facebook and Twitter have expanded in numbers of their users. How many quality Tweple have arrived? How many spammers? You know that those who have got very attractive pictures and negative Twitter golden ratio are often spammers, more they can even smuggle viruses. Is it the growth we want on Twitter? On the other hand, how many creative content and people with inventive ideas have appeared? How can you recognize and distinguish spammers from quality Tweple? What is really popular on Twitter – quality or quantity?
Let’s do a research which will show the “quality” of Twitter users’ population, at least based on the number of accounts which were suspended – for how long, if those people had any positive feedback despite of suspension and before. You can also check thoughts or ideas in contrary to tweets which are repeated, even without feedback – on both active or suspended accounts.
Quality Tweple, according to their positive feedback received, more – the kind of this feedback (not only for retweets but also really positive contribution to Twitter development) – are the real measure of Twitter growth. They usually tweet in this way regularly – even if the stuff is less trendy.
What have you contributed to make Twitter grow?
